Posted on 05/01/2024 9:59:09 PM PDT by libh8er
Nvidia's Jensen Huang was recently described as a boss who was "not easy to work with" by his employees. But the billionaire CEO seemed unaffected by it. In fact, he welcomed it. He said that the route to doing extraordinary things shouldn't be easy.
In an interview on 60 Minutes, the correspondent Bill Whitaker some of the words employees of the leading software company had used to describe Huang: "Demanding, perfectionist, not easy to work for."
Responding to this, the 61-year-old said those traits fitted him "perfectly."
"It should be like that," he was as quoted saying by the Business Insider. "If you want to do extraordinary things, it shouldn't be easy."
His leadership style appears to be working since Nvidia is one of the four companies in the world valued at more than $2 trillion after its stock-market value doubled in just 8 months last year.
(Excerpt) Read more at moneycontrol.com ...
Yeah, the silicon slum is full of all sorts of loudmouth foreigners rappin bout what tuff guys they are.
Lemme know when “Jensen” signs up to go shoot at Ali Akhbar Terrorist or Ivan the Bad or especially his bruthas in Beijing.
Funny how he didnt do any of things after “moving here” from Hong Kong. Just availed himself of all the goodies built by the caspers over the last couple of centuries
What are you babbling on about like a fool.
I’m always amazed at so called leaders that install hurdles to invention for success rather than assist in facing the problem of the need. In many cases they are the chief failure of the endeavor. You can’t force people to be brilliant. The leader can only create an atmosphere suseptable to their efforts.
If the leader demands the methodology, then the extent of the success is limited only to the leader’s provisions, not to the limits of the inventor. It is rare when you can find a subordinate that will give you that above and beyond for the continued accomplishment of the base company. And you don’t badger him/her into attainment, you allow the free flow of the accomplishments and thus create both your own and his/her own future prosperity. A good leader should always create their own competition, not stymie it. And this is done through the thought that people don’t work for me, they work with me. And the only thing I can really do for them is take the pressure of overall reponsibility away and allow free enterprise. A horse runs best when the reins are stretched. Give them the reason, the training, the atmosphere, the horse power, the reward possibilities, and get out of their way.
wy69
I’m always amazed at so called leaders that install hurdles to invention for success rather than assist in facing the problem of the need. In many cases they are the chief failure of the endeavor. You can’t force people to be brilliant. The leader can only create an atmosphere suseptable to their efforts.
If the leader demands the methodology, then the extent of the success is limited only to the leader’s provisions, not to the limits of the inventor. It is rare when you can find a subordinate that will give you that above and beyond for the continued accomplishment of the base company. And you don’t badger him/her into attainment, you allow the free flow of the accomplishments and thus create both your own and his/her own future prosperity. A good leader should always create their own competition, not stymie it. And this is done through the thought that people don’t work for me, they work with me. And the only thing I can really do for them is take the pressure of overall reponsibility away and allow free enterprise. A horse runs best when the reins are stretched. Give them the reason, the training, the atmosphere, the horse power, the reward possibilities, and get out of their way.
wy69
He shorted the stock.
What he really means is, "If you want others to do extraordinary things, it shouldn't be easy."
[I’m always amazed at so called leaders that install hurdles to invention for success rather than assist in facing the problem of the need. In many cases they are the chief failure of the endeavor. You can’t force people to be brilliant. The leader can only create an atmosphere suseptable to their efforts.
If the leader demands the methodology, then the extent of the success is limited only to the leader’s provisions, not to the limits of the inventor. It is rare when you can find a subordinate that will give you that above and beyond for the continued accomplishment of the base company. And you don’t badger him/her into attainment, you allow the free flow of the accomplishments and thus create both your own and his/her own future prosperity. A good leader should always create their own competition, not stymie it. And this is done through the thought that people don’t work for me, they work with me. And the only thing I can really do for them is take the pressure of overall reponsibility away and allow free enterprise. A horse runs best when the reins are stretched. Give them the reason, the training, the atmosphere, the horse power, the reward possibilities, and get out of their way.
wy69]
Steve Jobs was a visionary. He presided over four revolutions - (1) the creation of the first mass market personal computer, (2) the creation of the first mass market PC with a graphical user interface, (3) the routinization of computerized animation (during his tenure at Pixar) at a level never before achieved and (4) the creation of the first portable devices with touch driven graphical user interfaces that were as intuitive as its rivals were clunky. And through it all, he was known as a very difficult boss, abrupt and moody, prone to belittling his minions and terrorizing them with threats of firing, many of which involved actual separations from the companies he ran.
I am not a fan of Apple devices and have never bought or owned one. But the man was truly sui generis - one of a kind - in the way he made his vision a reality where others failed. And his relentless scumbaggery was, unfortunately, as integral to the success of his efforts as his exquisite personal taste, which flensed away everything that should not be part of the final product, while keeping a close eye on cost.
Exactly. They never say “We will pay more for more effort”. It’s always “Put forth more effort and you might get more money but only if you threaten to leave”. Being retired has opened my eyes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.