Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden invokes executive privilege to prevent release of recording with Special Counsel Hur
Just The News ^ | May 16, 2024 | Madeleine Hubbard and Steven Richards

Posted on 05/16/2024 10:48:44 AM PDT by Red Badger

The Justice Department's Legal Counsel Office said the recording should be considered protected by executive privilege. Chairman Comer says the claim "changes nothing" and vows to continue contempt proceedings.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

President Joe Biden on Thursday claimed the recording of his interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur about his retention of classified documents should not be released due to executive privilege just hours before House Republicans were set to move toward holding Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for not releasing the recordings.

The Justice Department's Legal Counsel Office said the recording should be considered protected by executive privilege, and Garland should not be punished for not releasing it, Associate Attorney General Carlos Uriatre said.

"I write to inform you that the President has asserted executive privilege over the requested audio recordings and is making a protective assertion of privilege over any remaining materials responsive to the subpoenas that have not already been produced," Uriatre wrote in a letter Thursday, according to CNN.

"It is the longstanding position of the executive branch held by administrations of both parties that an official who asserts the president’s claim of executive privilege cannot be held in contempt of Congress," he also wrote, per the Associated Press.

"Because of the President’s longstanding commitment to protecting the integrity, effectiveness, and independence of the Department of Justice and its law enforcement investigations, he has decided to assert executive privilege over the recordings," Counsel to the President Edward Siskel wrote in a letter to the Oversight and Judiciary Committees Thursday. Siskel also claimed providing the tapes would risk "harming future law enforcement investigations," according to the letter obtained by Just the News.

File 2024-05-16.Siskel_to_Comer_and_Jordan_re_Privilege.pdf The classified documents probe did not result in any charges being brought against the president, with Hur's report concluding that a jury would likely find him to be a "sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory."

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer said Biden's executive privilege claim would not change his committee's efforts to hold Garland in contempt.

"It's a five-alarm fire at the White House. Clearly President Biden and his advisors fear releasing the audio recordings of his interview because it will again reaffirm to the American people that President Biden's mental state is in decline. The House Oversight Committee requires these recordings as part of our investigation of President Biden's mishandling of classified documents," Comer said in a statement posted to X.

"The White House is asserting executive privilege over the recordings, but it has already waived privilege by releasing the transcript of the interview. Today's Hail Mary from the White House changes nothing for our committee. The House Oversight Committee will move forward with its markup of a resolution and report recommending to the House of Representatives that Attorney General Garland be held in contempt of Congress for defying a lawful subpoena," he added.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arrestgarland; criminalobstruction; electioninterference; roberthur
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 05/16/2024 10:48:44 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Biden should allow all the truth to come out.

Like Stormy Daniels on film Biden should claim he has nothing to hide.


2 posted on 05/16/2024 10:51:51 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There are so many holes in that executive privilege claim I don’t know where to start, and I’m not even a legal/constitutional scholar.


3 posted on 05/16/2024 10:52:53 AM PDT by william clark (A man who is unwilling to be proven wrong has little regard for truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Carlos Uriarte, The Real American™

Just another Anchor Baby from the East Bay cesspool

4 posted on 05/16/2024 10:53:42 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“...the integrity, effectiveness, and independence...”

The DoJustUs has no integrity and no independence.

It’s very effective in using its fascist, jack-booted thugs against its political enemies, real and imagined.


5 posted on 05/16/2024 10:53:52 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: william clark

Yes, Executive privilege is supposed to shield close confidential discussions with TOP aides. Certainly NOT a prosecutor who is obligated to nail you and has given you Miranda warnings.


6 posted on 05/16/2024 11:00:29 AM PDT by shalom aleichem (Sick 'n Tired! Tell us wnat to DO about it! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

It’s not about the truth. It’s about Biden sounding like a dufus.


7 posted on 05/16/2024 11:00:41 AM PDT by Rennes Templar (Come back, President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It’s not his to stop. Congress already has a transcript. Wouldn’t that be election interference?


8 posted on 05/16/2024 11:03:25 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Sounds impeachable, by Democrat standards


9 posted on 05/16/2024 11:04:04 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (We have not yet achieved peak crazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Its because that video is SO SO SO bad if it were to EVER come out it would sink Biden’s entire bogus presidency


10 posted on 05/16/2024 11:06:02 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

If this were Trump someone in the DOJ would have already released it to the media


11 posted on 05/16/2024 11:06:38 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar
It’s about Biden sounding like a dufus.

Okay. So business as usual. Nothing's changed.

12 posted on 05/16/2024 11:06:54 AM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Hmmm....Executive Privilege for Briben, but, not for Pres Trump?


13 posted on 05/16/2024 11:10:00 AM PDT by Jane Long (The role of the GOP: to write sharply-worded letters as America becomes a communist hell-hole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

Sounds impeachable, by Democrat standards


Agree.


14 posted on 05/16/2024 11:10:28 AM PDT by Jane Long (The role of the GOP: to write sharply-worded letters as America becomes a communist hell-hole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

While he has Peter Navarro in jail for the same claim.


15 posted on 05/16/2024 11:11:31 AM PDT by bray (It's not racist to be racist against races you do not like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: william clark
I have litigated successfully against the assertion of claims of executive privilege used to prevent public disclosure by the Governor, at the time, of the State of RI. Executive privilege keeps information secret regarding why a particular policy decision was made by the executive branch. In our case, we showed that the information we sought had nothing to do with a decision thus executive privilege did not attach. In regard to FJB, the tape of the interview and its contents had nothing to do with A POLICY DECISION, therefore Executive Privilege does not apply. PERIOD.
16 posted on 05/16/2024 11:11:34 AM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jpp113

What FJB and Garland are saying, without actually saying it, by this bogus privilege assertion, is the same as Trump’s argument about presidential immunity. Brandon and Garland cannot be seen as agreeing with Trump on this issue, so they now tell another the lie and dig their hole deeper.


17 posted on 05/16/2024 11:16:42 AM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Think there might be some differences between the recording and the transcript? He waived privilege when they released the transcript.


18 posted on 05/16/2024 11:20:23 AM PDT by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Executive privilege has pretty much been voided the last seven years Joe. That whole goes around comes around thing.


19 posted on 05/16/2024 11:24:16 AM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Appeal this to the supreme Court... And hurry!


20 posted on 05/16/2024 11:31:31 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson