Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live thread [05/06/2024]: Trump show trial in New York, brought to you by Biden operative Matt Colangelo; post comments here
Sidebar Mod

Posted on 05/06/2024 7:07:49 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator

Lemme know if you find a crime. Haven’t seen one yet.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bidenreich; colangelo; hushmoneytrial; hushtrumptrial; trump; trumppersecution

1 posted on 05/06/2024 7:07:49 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator

Anyone find a crime yet? Take no action yourself. Report it immediately to fat Alvin and the crooked judge in his pocket!


2 posted on 05/06/2024 7:52:59 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator

Was there supposed to be a link to an article?

Had Trump’s accountants booked the $400,000 payment as “Hush Money Payments to Whores” in October 2026, the related tax returns would not be due until Spring 2017. No public scrutiny or audit of records would have been possible for months after that — probably for a year after the election.

Based on the time line, Trump had no motive to characterize the $400,000 as Legal versus Public Relations expenses.

Based on the tax implications, Trump would get no benefit from booking the costs as Legal versus Public Relations expenses.

A charge that Trump conspired with Cohen to hide the “hush money” payments by manipulating the timing thereof, thus depriving the electorate of the salacious, and possibly false, calumny it needed to vote, is ludicrous.

The payment to Cohen was at least in part for his legal services, and in part to reimburse Cohen purchasing the stories and procuring related NDAs.

There is no felony in this, and no crime even for the expired “False record” offenses. The records were not actually false.

The Biden operatives running the case know this. Did the Lawfare/Media complex put out “look squirrel” clues about the potential “crime” to divert attention? My concern is that they will puke up something unanticipated at the very end that throws the defense for a loop, and gives the jury the excuse to convict that it craves.

Therefore, we need to get anticipating. WHAT COULD THEY POSSIBLY CONCOCT? WHAT SECRET WITNESSES WILL THEY CALL?
Because they WILL have something up their sleeves.


3 posted on 05/06/2024 8:05:12 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah
Thee is no crime, this is strictly a muddy up Trump with sex stories operation, with the kicker being they have a corrupt Democrat judge and a questionable Democrat jury and a wing and a prayer of a conviction to go along with their muddy up operation.
4 posted on 05/06/2024 8:07:35 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

Well put.


5 posted on 05/06/2024 8:09:46 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: 1Old Pro

That was definitely the original plan. But I’m not seeing it in the polling. Everything they’ve tried has backfired politically.


7 posted on 05/06/2024 8:13:10 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The elephant in the room is the pending SCOTUS immunity decision. The bookingkeeping “crimes” occurred AFTER Trump became president. To the best of my recollection, no evidentiary hearings were held before plunging off the cliff.


8 posted on 05/06/2024 8:17:07 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator

The crooked judge blinked again. Found Trump in “contempt” but no jail. THEY KNOW JAILING TRUMP WILL BE THE POLITICAL BACKFIRE FOR THE AGES.


9 posted on 05/06/2024 8:22:41 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator

Why wasn’t the original order appealed? Why wasn’t the first contempt finding appealed?

WTF is going on with these guys?


10 posted on 05/06/2024 9:16:58 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson