Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Stands By Decision Rejecting Undated Pennsylvania Mail Ballots, In Blow To Left-Wing Activists
The Federalist ^ | 05/01/2024 | BRIANNA LYMAN

Posted on 05/01/2024 9:55:08 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected an attempt from left-wing organizations to have the court reconsider a ruling that found unelected bureaucrats were wrong to accept thousands of undated or incorrectly dated ballots during the 2020 election.

A three-judge panel for the 3rd Circuit ruled in a 2-1 decision in March that any mail-in ballots that arrive in envelopes missing a date or with an incorrect date are invalid, upholding a state law and overturning a lower court’s decision.

Several left-wing organizations appealed the ruling by petitioning the court to review the decision en banc, a petition which was denied on Tuesday. It’s a big blow for Democrat operative and Russia hoaxer Marc Elias, whose group supported the lawsuit against the state law and which called it a “crucial” and “critical” case ahead of 2024.

Pennsylvania adopted universal mail-in balloting in 2019, with the law requiring voters to “fill out, date and sign the declaration printed on [the] envelope” before returning their ballot. But thousands of ballots mailed in during the 2020 presidential election and 2022 midterms “did not comply with the date requirement” as they were either missing dates entirely or had incorrect dates, the 3rd Circuit panel ruled in March.

Years earlier, a panel of judges for the court had ruled the date requirement was in violation of the Materiality Provision of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which stipulates a voter cannot be denied their right to vote due to a paperwork issue that is “not material in determining whether such individual is qualified.” That decision was later vacated after the Supreme Court issued its 2022 decision in Ritter v. Migliori.

The issue then ended up in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court where the judges ruled the ballots were invalid under state law and found they should not be counted. The court, however, was split as to whether tossing the ballots entirely would violate the Materiality Provision, so the judges directed county election boards to “segregate and preserve” those ballots — though they were still not to be counted.

Left-wing groups filed a suit last year which resulted in Erie-based U.S. District Judge Susan Paradise Baxter ruling that ballots with missing or incorrect dates should be counted so long as they are received by Election Day. Republican organizations, including the Republican National Committee, appealed the decision. The panel for the 3rd Circuit overturned Baxter’s ruling, admitting that while their immediate reaction would be to find that a “failure to date a return envelope should not cause his ballot to be disqualified,” their role was simply to determine when the Materiality Provision can be applied.

“We hold that the Materiality Provision only applies when the State is determining who may vote,” Judge Thomas Ambra wrote. “In other words, its role stops at the door of the voting place. The provision does not apply to rules, like the date requirement, that govern how a qualified voter must cast his ballot for it to be counted.”


Brianna Lyman is an elections correspondent at The Federalist.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: ballots; court; mailin; pennsylvania; voting

1 posted on 05/01/2024 9:55:08 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What about the mail in ballots that didn’t have a crease in them?


2 posted on 05/01/2024 10:05:10 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

WOW! Three and a half years after it mattered. This question went to Amy Conehead Barrett a week before the election and she refused to participate because she had only been on the court for a week and deciding whether undated ballots coming in a week late were legit was tough for empty notepad girl. So Pennsylvania stuffed the ballot box with undated ballots coming in for another week or two.


3 posted on 05/01/2024 10:09:09 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Judges Shwartz, Krause, Restrepo and Freeman voted for rehearing en banc.

Three Obama stooges and a Biden stooge.

4 posted on 05/01/2024 10:12:57 PM PDT by kiryandil (Democrat Party operatives! Attack Rudy to avenge the laptop!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

exactly! this among many other reasons is why Trump says the election was stolen! Because state election laws were NOT followed!


5 posted on 05/01/2024 10:20:28 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; poconopundit; Jane Long; Diana in Wisconsin; Grampa Dave; Godzilla; Vaduz; null and void; ...

p


6 posted on 05/02/2024 2:01:01 AM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
closing
7 posted on 05/02/2024 2:56:54 AM PDT by MikelTackNailer (We can never stop failing for the minute we do, we fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
I’m genuinely surprised this stupid Pennsylvania requirement hasn’t been overturned in court.

1. If a mail-in ballot is received before Election Day then it makes no difference what date is on the envelope.

2. The PA law is so useless because it doesn’t specify WHAT DATE needs to be posted on the envelope.

3. Unless the voter puts a date on the envelope that is clearly wrong (July 4th of 1776, for example), there’s no way to verify if the date they posted is actually the date the ballot was filled out.

8 posted on 05/02/2024 3:28:40 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
I’m genuinely surprised this stupid Pennsylvania requirement hasn’t been overturned in court.

1. If a mail-in ballot is received before Election Day then it makes no difference what date is on the envelope.

2. The PA law is so useless because it doesn’t specify WHAT DATE needs to be posted on the envelope.

3. Unless the voter puts a date on the envelope that is clearly wrong (July 4th of 1776, for example), there’s no way to verify if the date they posted is actually the date the ballot was filled out.

9 posted on 05/02/2024 3:36:48 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Filthadelphia CONTROLS ALL statewide offices in PA!
Just so sad a mostly conservative state is eaten up by, mostly, if not all, by Filthy SE PA!

Many states experience the same problem sadly


10 posted on 05/02/2024 6:47:00 AM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson