[rxsid]

UPDATE: David Pecker just testified that their is no written agreement or evidence of an agreement anywhere. He says it was just verbal and understood.

Why is he allowed to even take the stand when he doesn’t even have evidence to back up his claims? pic.twitter.com/Ce2Xv1XPu4— 🇺🇸Travis Media Group🇺🇸 (@TM1Politics) April 23, 2024

[Sarah Barracuda]

I havent believed a word from the National Enquirer since they keep on saying that Hillary Clinton has months to live, Im STILL waiting

[thegagline]

UPDATE: David Pecker just testified that their is no written agreement or evidence of an agreement anywhere. He says it was just verbal and understood. Why is he allowed to even take the stand when he doesn’t even have evidence to back up his claims?

Testimony is evidence . (FRE 601 et seq.)

Here is the salient part of the NY Unified Jury Instruction on the subject of testimony being evidence

“Testimony is of course the most common form of evidence and comes from the questioning of the witnesses by the lawyers, and perhaps by the court, [but not by the jury]. A question by itself is not evidence. It is the question with the answer that is the evidence”

[ridesthemiles]

WHY ARE COURTS ALLOWED TO EVEN DEMAND HE TESTIFY—WHEN PROSECUTION ALSO HAS NO “EVIDENCE”.