I’ll consider the truth of what the article is suggesting when I see it someplace other than GP.
Only on FR would you have someone more concerned with posting GP articles than the end of America.
So tired of the FR purists who only want CNN, NYT, and WaPo articles rather than up and coming conservative websites. Why don’t you go find a more pure site rather than censoring cutting edge reporters.
(I’ll consider the truth of what the article is suggesting when I see it someplace other than GP.)
Try this source.
voting, think again. An unprecedented move by Arizona’s Democratic Secretary of State Adrian Fontes just opened the way for non-citizens—legal or otherwise—to register for and cast a ballot in the 2024 election. That includes Arizona’s Republican primary in March, meaning the same illegal aliens flooding across our open border could vote against the leading closed borders candidate, President Donald Trump.
True, federal law prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections (punishable by fine and prison time); 19 foreign nationals were convicted of voting illegally in the 2016 elections. Arizona law similarly bars all non-citizens from voting—in state and local elections. “Federal-only” voters, however—individuals registered using the federal voter registration form, which is different from the state forms most of us are familiar with—are “eligible to vote solely in races for federal office in Arizona (including the Presidential Preference Election).” In other words, the March 2024 primary.
The federal form asks registrants to tick the boxes affirming that they are a U.S. citizen and 18 or older, but of course that registration must then be verified by state authorities. If an individual submits a state registration form but his U.S. citizenship cannot be verified and he neglects to provide documented proof of citizenship, he isn’t registered at all.
If he submits the same using a federal registration form, however, he’s registered as a “federal-only” voter entitled to vote in federal races, including the next presidential election.
I’m with you. I take Gateway Pundit with a grain of salt.
“ when I see it someplace other than GP.”
Good point. GP is no more a source of news than the National Enquirer is.
Then why did you post to this thread?you could easily pass it by, but like a liberal you insist on changing things to your liking. Try reading everything and then doing your own research.
I’ll consider the truth of what the article is suggesting when I see it someplace other than GP.
Amen to that. GWP had no cred with me. BB is not much better.
Gateway Pundit gets 99% of their news from other sites. I did the hard work for you.
because of course the nyt/cnn/abc/nbc is going to be all over this story
Agreed. One must consider the source, and that was the first thing I did.